Pugetia fragilissima & Pugetia
firma
Ecological Interactions

In the natural world, no species is completely
isolated, but instead, is part of dynamic ecological interactions.
In communities such as the rocky intertidal and subtidal
rocky reefs, the battle for space can create intensive competition
between algae, which can be further complicated by the stress
of herbivory. Pugetia firma and Pugetia fragilissima have
many interesting and unique ecological relationships with
other algae and animals in the ecosystem.
Many algae (and sessile animals) overcome the problem of limited space
by becoming epiphytic (growing
on other plants) or epizoic (growing
on animals). Pugetia does both. Pugetia firma normally
grows on rock, but has been documented growing on both
on tunicates and Calliarthron, a coralline alga.
During this study Pugetia firma was additionally
observed growing on the stalk of a brown alga in the Laminariales. Pugetia
fragilissima also utilizes other organisms as substrates, growing epiphytically
on other red algae, such as Calliarthron and Chondracanthus.
Most notable however, is Pugetia fragilissima’s
growth on the tubes of specific polychaete worms. This
relationship is explored in more detail below.
Pugetia clearly benefits from its
ability to grow on a variety of substrates, however the
advantages don’t always extend to the host alga
as well. Epiphytes generally shade the anchor species,
impede gas and nutrient exchange, and thereby decrease
its growth rate (Lobban
and Harrison, 1997). Additionally, epiphytes can be
responsible for increasing the drag force felt by the anchor
species. Within the scope of this study, Pugetia has
not been observed with any other algae growing on it. Some
red algae defend themselves from epiphytes by periodically
shedding layers of cortex or
producing chemical properties in their cells that discourage
other organisms from attaching (Lobban
and Harrison, 1997). No such strategies have been researched
in Pugetia, but the lack of epiphytes suggests
that perhaps Pugetia has developed some level
of defense.
However, Pugetia is not completely
immune to invading species, but often serves as a host
for endophytic alga.
Many pressings of both Pugetia firma and Pugetia
Fragilissima in the G.M. Smith
Herbarium reveal endophytic algae within their tissue.
One Pugetia firma specimen dissected in this study
was shown to have a small endophytic brown alga living
within its medulla. Using Keys to the Seaweeds and
Seagrasses of Oregon and California (Gabrielson
et al., 2004) it was
identified
as the gametophyte of either Desmarestia or a Laminariales.
The identification has not been verified, but both these
groups of algae have been known to have an endophytic gametophyte stage
in red algae.
Pugetia fragilissima was also found
to have a highly calcified bryozoan colony growing on it.
Although the blades of Pugetia fragilissima are
probably too delicate to support the colony independently,
the bryozoans extended their growth from the tube of a worm
they were both living on. More than likely, Pugetia
fragilissima would not be able to survive long with
the weight and shadow of the colony.
Perhaps
the most interesting ecological interaction observed was between Pugetia
fragilissima and one of two species of Chaetopteridae polychaete
worms, Phyllochatopterus prolifica and Spiochaetopterus costarum. Pugetia
fragilissima is most reliably found growing on the translucent chitinous
tube built by these two species of Chaetopteridae polychaete worms.
Considering a living worm could never be collected and the tube itself is virtually
identical between these two species, it remains unclear whether Pugetia
fragilissima grows on both species or is limited to just one. Exploring
this question could be an interesting extension of this study.
Phyllochatopterus prolifica and Spiochaetopterus
costarum themselves are specialized segmented worms
in the family Chaetopteridae. These polychaetes
are filter feeders. They produce mucus bags or ropes,
which they extend and use to collect particles as small
as 0.5 micrometers (Rouse
and Pleijel, 2001). They secrete a chitin-like tube
from their J-shaped burrows, which can extend down 2m
into the substrate or attach to a hard surface (Rouse
and Pleijel, 2001). One end of the tube tends to
protrude out of the sandy or muddy substrate to allow
the worm to feed. On this end many algae have made a
home, but none are as dominant as Pugetia fragilissima,
which grows off the sides of the tube and then often
concentrates around the opening forming a rose-like shape.
When
they are abundant, diving over the sandy flats can almost
look like a wild flower meadow, with scattered stalks
topped by pinkish red petals. These dense patches are
the product of highly successful asexual reproduction
in these worms. At times as many as six young worms can
occupy one tube (Morris
et al,1990).
In addition to providing substrate in a space
-limited ecosystem, living on tubeworms may also help Pugetia
fragilissima avoid some herbivory. With their relatively
delicate and erect thalli, Pugetia
fragilissima and Pugetia firma would seem to be
very vulnerable to herbivores. Although specific herbivory
events have not been observed, Pugetia may make
an excellent meal for some other type of organism. Interestingly, Pugetia
fragilissima specimens growing on tubes far out in
sand flat appear to be much larger than those closer to
rocky substrates or artificial reefs like pipelines. Perhaps
by growing on tubeworms slightly away from the concentrated
community on the rocks, it avoids some potential herbivores
that choose not to venture out onto the sand.