| |||||||||
Rates of primary production were similar for in situ and simulated in situ incubations on the NSF cruises (BARBER, 1993). Differences between these incubation methods, however, were encountered when integrating over the water column using the in situ depths and those estimated using an optical model (MOREL, 1988; CHAVEZ et al., 1990). The in situ integrated values were 1.39 times the simulated in situ integrated values (BARBER, 1993). For the present set of calculations, water column production measurements calculated using the optical model were multiplied by 1.39. CHLOROPHYLL Chlorophyll a and phaeopigments were determined by the fluorometric technique using a Turner Designs Model 10-005 R fluorometer that was calibrated with commercial chlorophyll a (Sigma). Samples for determination of plant pigments were filtered onto 25-mm Whatman GF/F glass fiber filters and extracted in 90% acetone in a freezer for between 24 and 30 hours (VENRICK and HAYWARD, 1984). Other than the modification of the extraction procedure, the method used is the conventional fluorometric procedure of HOLM-HANSEN et al. (1965) and LORENZEN (1966). Additional samples were also filtered onto 0.2, 1.0 and 5.0 mm pore size Nuclepore membrane filters. POC AND PN Samples for the analysis of particulate organic carbon (POC) and particulate nitrogen (PN) were collected on precombusted GF/F filters. Volume filtered was 1L but on occasion replicate volumes (0.5, 1 and 2L) were filtered. At one station water was also filtered through 0.2 m Anopore filters as described by ALTABET, et al. (1989). Filters were dried at 60ºC, fumed with concentrated HCL, dried at 60ºC and packed into nickel sleeves. The analysis was carried out on a Leeman Labs CHN analyzer using acetanilide as a standard. PROTISTAN BIOMASS Phytoplankton and small heterotrophs were sized and counted with epifluorescence microscopy (CHAVEZ et al. 1990, 1991). In addition to enumerating organisms on 0.2 mm pore size filters, larger and rarer organisms were enumerated on 5.0 mm pore size filters through which 200 ml was filtered. In CHAVEZ et al. (1991) we erroneously reported the use of STRATHMANN (1967) volume to carbon conversions for flagellates and diatoms. The conversions used are the modifications reported by EPPLEY et al. (1970). Comparison of these formulae with those of VERITY et al. (1992) shows these two are equivalent (slope not significantly different than 1, intercept not significantly different than zero). For Synechococcus we have again used the GLOVER et al. (1988) (94fgC cell-1) biomass estimate. This is substantially lower than that reported by CUHEL AND WATERBURY (1984) (290fgC cell-1) or VERITY et al. (1992) (246fgC cell-1). As in CHAVEZ et al. (1991) we estimate prochlorophyte biomass from chlorophyll. Our estimate of 24 fgC cell-1 is substantially lower than the 53 fgC cell-1 used by CAMPBELL et al. (1994). Large differences are also found between our estimate of 495 fgC cell-1 for eukaryotic picoplankton and 2100 fgC cell-1 of CAMPBELL et al. (1994). MICROZOOPLANKTON GRAZING Grazing rates on the small phytoplankton and their growth rates were measured using minor modifications of the dilution technique by LANDRY AND HASSETT (1982) and following JGOFS protocols. Samples from the 30% light level (as determined with a secchi disk) were diluted with filtered water from that depth. The 30% light level fluctuated between 20 and 30 meters. The dilutions were at 100, 75, 50, and 25% of the initial sample. Changes in biomass over 24h incubations were followed with chlorophyll extractions. Incubations were for 24 hours in simulated in situ deck incubations with neutral density filters. UNDERWAY MEASUREMENTS
Next: Results |
|
|